By Professor Doom
I’m all for
freedom of speech, but the rulers of our campuses think otherwise. It isn’t
simply they wish to control what’s said in the classroom, they’ll cheerfully
punish, and punish hard, a professor who dares express wrongthink on social
media, as I’ve documented many times in this blog.
Now, when faced
with such smackdown, the professor can fight back (we do have this Bill of
Rights thing), but such fights are tough. You can’t win in the heavily rigged
university system, so that means the “real” courts…and that means time and
money. Generally, the professors win when they do this, possibly
even by presenting the case to the supreme court, but I
find such victories Pyrrhic at best—even if you get your money back, the fight
can take years you’ll never regain, and going back to work for an infuriated
boss eager for payback isn’t fun.
Curiously, the
free speech abuse cases I’ve covered all go one way, namely with a professor
saying something against the Social Justice Warrior agenda.
What happens when
a professor is racist, but in a SJW-approved manner?
…posting on Facebook that he hates “white people.”
Well, that
certainly is racist, in the classic definition of the word for hating a whole
classification of people based on skin color. No judgement here on my part,
though I can’t help but note the professor is white (and hasn’t
self-destructed, leading me to believe he, like so many who virtue signal this
kind of stuff, doesn’t actually believe it).
In response to
his rant, some social media sites shut him down, and the University did have a
response:
Before the fall semester started, Rutgers announced that Livingston’s
Facebook posts had violated the university’s Policy Prohibiting Discrimination
and Harassment.
While I don’t
approve of the university’s actions, this is consistent with how other
universities have behaved. Not being a law professor, he went to FIRE, the
Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, to help him out. Even with this
organization at his back, one would think the university would have the
integrity to hit the professor with suspensions and whatever, and force him to
fight in the courts for years to protect his rights. I mean, if we assume the
school honestly believed what the professor did was inappropriate, one would
think that.
One would think
wrong:
“FIRE is pleased that Rutgers did the right thing and
reversed the charge of racial discrimination against Professor Livingston,” the
FIRE representative said. “Any other result would have undermined the free
speech and academic freedom rights of all Rutgers faculty members.”
Well, that was
quick, and easy…not even one semester of fighting and his university forgave
him. I’m not even sure what “reverse the charge” means in this context…does
this mean outright approval of his racism? I guess I’ll let legal scholars
figure that one out.
Is this going to
be yet another example of SJW hypocrisy, or will other, similar infringements
of free speech by universities likewise be overturned before a long court
battle ensues?
Only time will
tell, but, call me cynical, I lean towards hypocrisy here.
No comments:
Post a Comment