By Professor
Doom
Absolutely there are legitimate
institutions of higher education (most states have a “flagship” university that
is allowed to be legitimate). Outside of these special places, however,
standards went into freefall years ago. This has led to many community colleges
being unhinged, with what actually goes on
in the classroom unrelated to what, on paper, is claimed is going on in a
college education.
I’m hardly alone in such observations, but
I concede that most of what I hear in this regard is coming from other
mathematical colleagues; we’re pretty good about quantitative, objective
measurements that what we’re doing in our classes today is far below what we
used to be doing…and what we claim to accreditation we are doing.
A post from an English professor confirms
that it isn’t just the “hard” fields like mathematics that know something has
changed:
--in much the same way that I used to
teach community college courses, but noticed that it dropped to high
school…then secondary school…then primary school, the professor here has looked
up and realized that he is part of a fraud.
It’s simple enough to understand what
happened. Social promotion in schools led students to come to college thinking
that “just show up” was all there was to education. Social promotion is coming to college
now, and one can
only guess what the end result of that will be.
Every semester many students in my freshman English classes
submit work that is inadequate in almost every respect.
--the same thing happened in my
classes. I’d ask questions like “what is 1/3 + 1/3?” and get answers like
“2/6”, or “3” or “8”, and only seldom get a correct answer.
As students poured into classes without the
slightest clue how to do anything, or how to learn anything, and without any
interest in learning how to do or learn anything, the professor has a choice:
fail everyone, or reduce standards. Administration in higher education quickly
got rid of faculty that took the “fail everyone” route.
Truth telling in my profession can also be hazardous to the pursuit of
tenure, so that was an added incentive to keep my head down.
I’ve certainly met more than my share of
professors that simply want to keep their head down, thinking that they’ll
somehow get tenure. That’s a faint hope, but the fact still remains that
speaking out about what’s going on in higher education is a bad idea.
So, faculty have no choice but to take the
standards down, down, down.
What have standards been reduced to in the
college where this professor has spoken out?
Early in the semester we must first
assess their ability to identify a complete sentence ― that is, one with a
subject and a verb. After that, somewhere around week five, we find out
if they can identify a topic sentence ― the thing that controls the content of
a paragraph.
Think this through for a bit. The
professor has a month to teach the skill of “identify a complete sentence.”
That means he spends time talking about verbs, and subjects, and how to
identify those as well.
Yes, that’s right, in college, the first
month of college English includes much discussion on “how to find the subject
and verb in a sentence.” After the first month, these nigh-adults will learn
how to look at a paragraph and identify a “topic sentence”. I’m not an English
expert, but this really seems below high school level.
A college semester is 4 months long, any
hope of learning any, well, college level work here? Nope. Much as many
“college” math courses are 6th to 8th grade, so it is in
English as well.
I can’t make this stuff up, and it’s
fairly comparable to what I’ve seen in my own field.
I really feel the professor is being too
kind here. Is “identify the verb” really a college level, or even high school
level, question? It really seems like that was the kind of thing I learned a
few years before high school. I know, the public schools are failing badly,
but, please, let’s think about this.
We’re spending a month teaching college students
how to find the verb, and subject, in a sentence, so they can communicate in a
basic level in the English language. A month. (See what I did there?) Please,
gentle readers with children, attempt to teach this to your child (one old
enough to read), and see with your own eyes, this really, really, shouldn’t
take a month, not if your child has even the slightest interest in learning
anything.
And our highly educated professionals are
spending a month to teach an adult this concept? It’s no different from when I
was spending a month or more trying to teach adults how to add fractions…and
failing easily as often as not.
What’s really going on here is massive
numbers of people are flowing onto campuses, and soaking up massive amounts of
tax and student loan money. Yes, these people get some of the money, but the
bulk of it flows into administrators’ profits…administrators that have no
problem robbing taxpayers, and extorting faculty into reducing standards to a
level that would be laughable if it were not so pathetic.
Interestingly enough, another professor
actually responded to the referenced complaint:
Wow, what planet is this guy from?
“Accept his contention”? Seriously? I receive many e-mails of near gibberish on
a regular basis, I’m more than willing to accept an English professor would get
the same. Allow me to present a couple of e-mails from students:
HEY I HAVE CAME UP WITH A
MAJOR PROBLEM AND I NEDD YOUR HELP PLEZ….MY MOTHER WAS DIGNOSED WITH CANCER AND
IM DA ONLY CHILD AT HOME AND I HAVE BEE MISSIN ALL MY SCHOOL AND I WAS WONDER
WOULD YU BE KINDA ENUFF TEW HELP ME REPLACE ALL MY MISSIN GRADES AND ASSIGMETS
PLEZ!!!
Please i dnt know how to solve the
questions under unit three, there is no graph work derived to solve the questions.Please help
me
Are the above incomprehensible? I suppose
not, barely, but I trust the gentle reader will concede that the above are not
exactly college level writing. Is it really grade 12 ½ work? I don’t think so.
While being a bit reluctant to take a
claim at face value, the response has some things of merit to say, though he
mostly just blames public education.
“Hey man, can you help me read the
lunch menu?”
--even in the 8th grade, I
had friends who couldn’t read “very well”. So I’d read the menu for them.
There have always been terrible students
in public schools, students that just get socially promoted up through the
grades. Now they’re in college, and social promotion has come to college…this won’t help them in the
slightest.
Still the professor has one thing I can’t
argue with:
That’s 33 hours spent each week outside class grading papers. This figure does not take into account additional time spent on daily record-keeping, helping kids before and after school, doing lunch duty, addressing discipline problems, and doing other things that conscientious teachers do.
Nor does it take into account the new demands placed on teachers for collecting data that may or may not serve a purpose.
--we collect plenty of data for no purpose in higher education, too.
He’s talking about public schools here,
but keep in mind, these massive class loads are now
common in higher education as well, even in writing courses.
Still, it’s nice that at least for
writing, college is still arguably high school. It’s easy enough to show that
for most other subjects, college is below high school, often
far below.
No comments:
Post a Comment