By Professor Doom
A few years ago, a
book named Academically
Adrift pointed out the results everyone working in higher ed
already knew: many college courses have no content. The book showed nearly half
of students gain no measurable skill after years
of college.
How could this
be? I mean, our colleges charge plenty, and any look at the syllabus and course
requirements shows that our students must be reading fairly advanced content as
well as writing about all the heady concepts they’re reading about. Academically
Adrift found that despite what it says on the syllabus most students barely
have to read, barely have to write, in their college courses, and can spend
their years on campus without ever having to do as much reading as a single one
of my blog posts, much less writing so much.
In other words,
many of our campuses practice fraud. The worst offenders are community
colleges, which studies
have found to be unhinged—literally what you find on the syllabus and textbooks
for the course has nothing to do with what actually happens in the course.
Fraud.
“Why don’t faculty
stop the fraud?” is a natural question, but the answer is simple: we’ve tried.
Any faculty who attempts to have standards is removed. At the universities,
tenure has slowed down this process, but it takes little effort to see tenure
is dying as an institution. Even without tenure, an entire department could
form a unified front, though I’ve seen multiple faculty fired for trying this.
The community colleges don’t generally have
tenure, and don’t have departments, either. Instead, they’re run from a
top-down design, with most faculty utterly powerless. So, there’s nothing to
slow the fraud of community college.
Every few months
we learn of new sex scandals on campus that went on for years, decades even.
The only reason these scandals are eventually discovered is because the crimes
are so horrible, the victims so numerous, that they can’t be covered up
forever.
On the other
hand, the academic fraud, though vile, I concede isn’t nearly as horrific as
what went on in the Penn State showers. We also don’t have nearly so many
victims complaining—not many kids will complain about a free ‘A,’ after all. I
assure the gentle reader long running academic frauds are definitely in
progress on many campuses. They’ve been going on so long that faculty being
fired for having integrity is something of a rare event nowadays, so I feel the
need to highlight an example, to show that it still goes on:
Now, obviously,
admin doesn’t tell faculty directly to “dumb it down.” What do they say?
Nathaniel
Bork, a philosophy teacher, was fired after questioning the Community College
of Aurora's new "student success initiative."
Doesn’t “student success
initiative” sound better than “remove a few more chapters and writing
assignments”? It sure does, but the latter is more honest. On the surface you
do get “student success” this way, but year after year of removing content
leads to students now spending years on campus without having to do anything at
all…besides pay that tuition. “Suck up all the student loan money” is a success
in administration’s eyes, I assure the gentle reader.
The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) recently
released a
report about a community college professor who
was terminated for maintaining high academic standards for his students. The
higher ed institution was the Community College of Aurora (CCA),
Colorado, and the professor was Nathaniel Bork, a teacher of philosophy.
I cite the link
above; honest, there are scholars trying to keep academic standards, but it
does no good. Admin holds all the cards. The largest sex scandals are probably
going on at the universities (mostly because of sportsball), but the biggest
academic scandals are at the community colleges. The gentle reader might recall
the huge UNC scandal, but
that was revealed, after 18 years, because there were some protocols for
revealing fraud that slowly did their job; the community college frauds are
essentially immortal because they have no such protocols.
So what happened
when this professor said he would continue to have academic standards?
[I]n September, Bork
received a call from his department chair and dean at Aurora, who told him that
he was done teaching there -- effective immediately. The college eventually
blamed the decision on what it called Bork’s ‘lack of effectiveness in
implementing the philosophy curriculum redesign.’
Seriously, that’s
how quick it is. Complain, and you’re gone, overnight. Oh, they’ll use long
words like “curriculum redesign” but “fraud” really is all we’re talking about
here.
What exactly was
the “redesign”?
“…he’d been asked to
cut 20 percent of his introductory philosophy course content; require fewer
writing assignments, with a new maximum of eight pages per semester; offer
small-group activities every other class session; and make works by women and
minority thinkers about 30 percent of the course…”
Please understand,
this course likely had already taken 20% cuts to content multiple times in
previous years. Just as the “College Algebra” course I taught in community
college now holds less than half the material than the algebra course I took in
the 10th grade, so too are other courses finding their content
reduced by admin to insignificance.
Administrative
department head: “Welcome to our new college algebra course. It’s algebra
without the algebra.”
--the
above is from a state university I worked at.
I’ve mentioned
many times how the math classes have been gutted. The philosophy courses are
being dumbed down for the same reason:
“…he was told to keep
teaching this way until 80 percent of all student demographic groups were
passing the course…”
Again, this “80% pass rate” is the goal.
Most faculty today get this memo, and simply pass everyone, even students who
might not even have come to class or done even a single assignment (assuming
the course has even a single assignment). Is education supposed to be about
learning, or about just making it into the “at least 80%” category?
“…violated
the spirit of Colorado law on guaranteed transfer courses to a four-year
institution.”
The above ultimately is the problem.
Community colleges suck in students with promises of “we’ll prepare you for
university, and we’re cheaper” while the reality is very little of community
college is worthwhile. It’s why 80% of community college
students get nothing from community college. Imagine if the reality of my previous
and documented sentence were well known…would we still waste tax dollars on
those pits?
Alas, that knowledge will likely never be
known outside of this blog, any more than the fact that most community colleges
have “cleaned” out the few remaining faculty who think there should be
standards. For all I know, this will be the last faculty member that needed
removal.
No comments:
Post a Comment