By Professor
Doom
Just when I think higher education can’t
become any more warped…it reaches a new level of dementedness. Let’s take a
look:
People, even very educated people, say
some pretty stupid things at times, but how exactly did this level of idiocy
actually make it to this level of publicity? Once the stupid thing was said,
was there truly nobody down the line of communication who said “Wait. What?”?
I learned Spanish from a Cuban, and
Mandarin from someone born in China, and many of my mathematics courses were
taught by people with a different skin than me (they were primarily from India)…it
never occurred to me that their ethnicity could possibly prevent me from
learning.
I’ve quoted but one line, above, but it’s
such a train wreck that I feel the need to parse it out, the better to
highlight on just how many levels this is wrong:
Old
How bizarre is it that “old” is a slur in
reference to a teacher? For thousands of years, it was generally understood
that old people were more likely to know things than young people…but now it’s
a problem.
Old white
What has happened to us that this sort of
racism is acceptable? Imagine the screeching in the media if someone complained
that they couldn’t learn from a black person.
Old white academics
Again, I’m confused. If you’re learning
an academic subject, shouldn’t you learn it from an academic or at least
consider that a positive? If I wanted to learn, say, professional wrestling,
I’d be very honored to have Hulk Hogan as a teacher, even though he’s an old
white wrestler. It’s just nuts how stupid this all is, but the quote continues:
Old white academics are 'unable' to
teach
Beyond the stupidity, the whole “unable to
teach” line represents what’s happened in higher education. In times past, the
only people on campus were those that were interested in learning. Yes, sure,
there were and are bad teachers, but for the most part if a student isn’t
learning, it’s the student’s fault. Now if a student isn’t learning it’s
because the professor is “unable to teach.”
Already, we’ve reduced grading so that an
A- is the average grade, we’ve reduced coursework so that many courses require
insignificant levels of reading or writing, and we’ve changed campus policies
so that students can fail and drop courses for years and yet stay on campus,
racking up debts instead of going off to do something productive.
But, yeah, it’s the teacher’s fault if the
student fails in this environment.
“Old white academics are 'unable' to
teach black students…”
Why is the inherent racism here not a
problem? Ok, the rest of quote tries to explain away the racism:
“…because they're potentially racist”
That’s right, the blatant racism is excused because of potential racism. You know, the people I learned from were
potential murderers…it never occurred to me that this means I couldn’t learn
from them.
If we’re really going to use “potential”
as a reason to get rid of people, well, hey, every administrator on campus is a
potential child molester, let’s get to it! I know, it doesn’t work that way,
I’m just highlighting the intellectual dishonesty here, on top of all the other
problems.
Alexandria, in Africa, was a research
center for centuries, starting a few thousand years ago; scholars from
throughout the world went there to learn and study...over the course of
centuries, the issue of “we can’t learn from people with different skin color”
never came up. The learning center in Timbuktu, also in Africa, had 25,000
students, over 500 years ago, and yet, somehow the varying skin colors of the
teachers and students were never an issue.
Seriously, something is wrong with higher ed today. Already way
off the rails, the study nevertheless manages to go further into the hinterlands of insanity:
“…under-representation
of black people among the teaching staff, relative to the student body, made
students feel 'isolated'”
No.
There are many subgroups of workers on
campus where “white males” are under-represented (Hello Mathematics! Hello
African Studies! Hello Gender Studies!)…and yet I don’t see any hue and cry to
change that. I really can’t accept the people advancing this stuff are being
intellectually honest until they start cutting back on the hypocrisy.
This whole report is just one long smear of racist foolishness,
compiled to explain why certain ethnic groups don’t do well on campus. I won’t
dare to hazard a guess, but the proposed solution, firing all the white people,
is idiocy.
A more reasonable solution, by far, is to
return to having entrance exams on campus, so that all the students coming in
have at least a minimal level of academic training and ability. This won’t
happen, of course, as that would cut into growth.
On the other hand, firing the academics
would further undermine education, and thereby further administrative power on
campus. It’s no surprise reports like this get written.
What is surprising is how few people on
campus are pointing and laughing. Granted, faculty are too terrorized to laugh, but admin gushes about the great ideas here:
Dr
Deborah Johnston, pro-director (Learning and Teaching) at SOAS, said: 'We
attach a great deal of importance to our diverse community here at SOAS. It
enables a wide range of perspectives to be brought into the classroom, which
greatly benefits and enriches the academic debates and discussions. Our
diversity is something of which we are very proud.'
--SOAS is the fiefdom that printed
the report. Hey look, another admin whose title is twice as long as her (what,
you think she’d be an old white male?) name. Recall, titles this long are my
standard for positions that can be safely removed with no impact on education
and research, the actual purposes of higher education. Does anyone even know
what a “pro-director” is, as opposed to just a plain ol’ “director”?
Luckily, the comments section shows that “deplorable” people can
tell what a joke this all is. Let me highlight a few:
If
I were to say, a black teacher can not teach or relate to white student's (sic).
I would be bagged and tagged a racist, and justly so.
So
let me get the right, black students are judging the teaching ability of a
teacher by the colour of their skin..is this not the definition of racism?
So are they saying that black people should only be taught by black people? Which must mean that white people must only be taught by white people? Totally racist
What
an incredibly racist assertion. Older academics are more likely to be white
because when they graduated there were far fewer non white people in the UK.
What are they supposed to do retire early to appease PC research like this?
Isn’t it amazing that everyone else can
see what our doctoral-level administrators cannot? Why is that?
Again, as I see higher education engaging in
idiocy that is completely obvious to everyone outside of campus, I’m forced to
wonder just how long until the entire system collapses under the sheer weight
of the incompetence.
Not long, I hope.
No comments:
Post a Comment