By Professor Doom
It’s been a while
since I’ve pointed out higher education’s peculiar madness when it comes to
sportsball. There is so much corruption in higher education that I try to focus
a little, but a recent article so brutally emphasized that something is wrong
here that I feel the need to come back to this.
Yes, we all know
the highest
paid public employee in any given state is probably a coach, but even the
simple picture in that link fails to show just how insane higher education is. Looking at that map, one might think
that, while the highest paid is a coach, perhaps the second best pay goes to an
educator, or at least an administrator.
No.
Much as the Poo
Bah has ridiculous pay, and is surrounded by sycophants likewise paid
ridiculous amounts, so too is the coach. Since coach pay is in the
stratosphere, even the “somewhat lower” pay of the sub-coaches is still an
insane amount.
Let’s talk about
coach pay, just at UC Berkeley. Hey, do you know what team(s) Berkeley is
famous for? Me neither. I grant that I’m not into sports, but it seems like
over the course of decades Berkeley’s great athletic programs would have come
up somewhere for me.
The highest paid
employee at Berkeley is the coach, of course. He’s not even a winner:
Gee whiz, you
don’t even need to coach a winning
team to get nearly $2 million a year in loot. Please understand, the $1.8
million dollar salary doesn’t tell the whole tale, there are a great number of
perks that put the effective salary way over that nominal salary…besides the
slavish adoration of fans.
Is the gentle
reader stunned that the highest paid employee is not even a coach of a winning
team? It gets worse:
“Dykes was followed
closely by Jeff Tedford (at $1,800,000), the Bears’ former coach who was still
on the payroll in 2014 despite having been relieved of his coaching
responsibilities…
How does anyone
look at this and not suspect something is wrong here? This guy isn’t even a
coach and still gets that kind of pay? As I sit here and realize that every
institution I’ve left, I’ve left in good standing, and walked away with
nothing…I can’t help but be annoyed that the folks at the top get such generous
benefits.
Perhaps I’m just
a bitter and envious person, but the gentle reader should understand that these
huge salaries are paid by taxpayers. At the very least, keep this in mind when
you are told there needs to be a tuition increase due to lack of money in the
system…
Ok, so the
highest paid employee at UC Berkeley is a coach, and the second highest paid is
a guy who once was a coach. Could it get more insane? Sure:
The next five highest
paid UC Berkeley employees were also coaches,” the report added.
The article I’m quoting from
isn’t even about the high pay of coaches, it’s more about the ridiculous pay
that floats up to the top. While I really wanted to focus on how the money
we’re paying into education simply isn’t going into education, it’s fair to
also point out that higher education is also a system of political plunder:
Another vocal income
inequality expert at UC Berkeley, Professor Robert Reich – former secretary of
labor under Bill Clinton’s administration who in 2013 helped produce the film
“Inequality for All” – earned $263,592 in 2014, the think tank’s report states.
Isn’t it great how these Left-wingers keep
giving speeches telling me I need to give up my money and reduce my pay to help
resolve income inequality, even as they’re getting paid hand-over-fist to give
the speech on how I should work for less?
“But Reich’s salary
was likely not his only source of income in 2014,” it adds. “Reich makes
himself available to give paid speeches through a number of speaking bureaus,
charging a fee estimated at $40,000 per talk. He is also likely to receive some
income from his books, movies and pensions from previous employers.”
Maybe Reich is a
special case, but the fact remains: so much of the money that’s flooding higher
education is just going to the people at the top. Again, I conclude we must
turn off the student loan scam, and even if doing so would guarantee my
unemployment…my conclusion is unchanged.
No comments:
Post a Comment