By Professor Doom
A brief post
today, hopefully for better impact.
“We need
more women in mathematics, there aren’t enough.”
--from a
student; I’m not criticizing the student, they’re all trained to say this.
Like so many false
thoughts, the “need” for more women in mathematics has been ground into our
heads since childhood. Don’t get me wrong, I totally acknowledge there are
fewer women than men in my advanced math courses, no doubt at all about that,
though I’m not worried about it.
There are also
fewer women boxers, too…I’m ok with that as well.
Admin: “We’re
starting a new initiative to attract more female math majors.”
--I doubt
I’ve gone two consecutive years in higher ed without seeing something like this,
and usually I’m fanned by nodding heads in support of it.
But just because
there is a perceived shortage of one gender or another in a field doesn’t mean
it must be rectified. Such considerations are far beyond my pay grade, however.
Administration always wheels out “in the past, women were discriminated
against, so we need to give them extra help now.” Trying to explain that “two
wrongs don’t make a right” is a quick path to the unemployment line, and so I,
and most other faculty, keep quiet about it…it’s hard to see much harm being
done with such programs, even if they are immoral.
It’s not just
mathematics, of course, that must engage in such immoral behavior:
--I
encourage the reader to consider the writing in the above carefully, the better
to see the immense sexism there. The first school openly admits their sexist
hiring policies, for example.
Throughout higher
ed there is immense effort to rectify this “problem.” It doesn’t matter that,
overall, far more college students are female than male, they outnumber
males by the millions, in fact. Always, the drive is for more,
and it’s beyond the excessive fetishization of growth that higher education
administrators already hold. They don’t just want moar, they want more females
in specific fields. There’s even such a thing as “feminist
biology,” to give an idea of the willingness to dement academics in
pursuit of this goal. I’m hard pressed to find a good analogue for “feminist,”
but I’m dying to see if there’s a degree program in “masculinist biology.” If
anyone knows of such, feel free to use the contact form.
Whatever, we’re
all about equality in higher ed now, even if some genders are more equal than
others. Thus we have endless programs to recruit female students, to retain
female faculty. Let’s go with the flow, then, and assume admin is telling the
truth that they’re really interested in doing something about a minority that
has suffered discrimination.
Males dominate
mathematics and STEM in general, so we need to have special programs to make
males less important there. Let’s look at another faction that dominates higher
education:
--note: “notable
increase.” The Leftist bias has been there for a very long time, it somehow
managing to become even more extreme
is notable.
There’s a huge
leftist slant in higher education, not merely in the administration, but also
in the faculty. There’s
also a strong record of anti-conservative bias and discrimination in higher
education as well, not just faculty, but students have lost their jobs for
being conservatives. It isn’t safe to be a conservative on campus. Many
faculty advise conservative peers to not to reveal their views until after
tenure, and a conservative student who reveals his point of view to the wrong
faculty will find himself failing the course.
So, conservatives
are a minority in higher ed faculty, and conservatives have been discriminated
against, both at the student and faculty level.
Where, pray tell,
are the endless programs seeking to recruit and retain conservative students
and conservative faculty? Is there even
one such program, anywhere?
Female STEM students are a
minority, and discriminated against, thus we must have programs to recruit more
of them.
Conservatives are
a minority, and discriminated against…and higher education sees nothing wrong
at all.
And so the
hypocrisy of higher education is demonstrated.
No comments:
Post a Comment