By Professor Doom
I know, I’ve
written about the academic atrocity at UNC a few times, but obviously all I
know for certain is what’s been published. I’ve made some conjectures, of
course, based on what I know of how higher education is run these days. So,
it’s good when a book comes out and says what I was already saying years ago.
The book is Cheated: The UNC Scandal, the Education of Athletes, and the Future of Big-Time College Sports, and before getting to the book, I want to talk about the reviews on Amazon, which are spit between 5 star and 1 star (mostly 5) reviews.
It’s always interesting when reviews are split like this, it means something is up. In this case, there are lots of people that buy into the “win at any cost” mentality of college sportsball. Some of the critical reviews really drive the point home of the mindset:
i
am quite sure this must go on at all schools to some degree--do you think Duke
basketball players can compete academically at Duke? Sure a few can but most
would have to have significant help
I’m a little hard pressed to consider this a fair review (from someone who didn’t buy the book, no less, though I admit the person might have read it). Just because it happens to some degree at most all schools, how does that make this book, documenting the cheating going on at UNC, bad? Boring, maybe, but you’d kinda think the reviewer here would know what he was getting. So, obviously a partisan, or a plant.
Another non-buyer of the book who we have to just assume read it:
To
say this book is disingenuous in the story that it tells would be to give it
too much credit. UNC clearly has some issues in regards to it's academic
program but the authors of this book are doing little more than making a
fraudulent attempt at cashing in on it. If you hate UNC and are a fan of
fiction this might be the book for you but if not I'd take a pass.
Again with the theme of “yeah, there are problems, but so what?” Is the
book a cash-in? Quite possibly, but the UNC scandal is so heavily documented
now that it’s pretty tough to call it “fiction”…and you can’t exactly call the
book fiction in one line while admitting to the problems the book discusses in
another. Again, I suspect something here.
One more:
Lazy. Dishonest. While there is a
problem with the education of the student athlete, this book is entirely about
the authors' personal desires and ambitions. It does a disservice to the cause
that they claim to champion.
Seriously, were
all the negative reviews written by one guy?
A few of the other negative reviews reference private e-mails that were
released, “somehow.” Gee, I’ve
certainly seen Admin do such things before to retaliate against a professor
speaking out. So, the e-mails are
supposed to destroy the credibility of the authors here…I’ll look at those
e-mails, but, again, the UNC scandal is pretty well documented at this point.
The gentle reader
needs to understand that the super heroic lengths admin has gone to cover up
the scandal means that a reasonable person should expect that what we know now, is the bare minimum of how bad the
corruption is…it’s almost certainly worse.
The 5 star
reviews, of course, have a more credible theme to them, and most of the reviews
are 5 stars. Let’s see what others
have to say:
The book is very hard on UNC’s administration, which ignored
evidence that many athletes in the big money sports…
Gee, who else has
been hard on admin? Oh yeah, me. Look, administrators are not educators,
they’re mercenaries. There’s nothing to stop them selling out higher education
for personal profit, and ultimately, selling out is their job. Time and again
I’ve seen admin come in, find out what the school had to be proud of, and cash
in on the prestige to enhance their own status…before moving up to another
position. Time and again I’ve been stunned at admin doing vicious, inhuman
things to our kids in college (especially community college)…and then been
stunned again when I learn that there’s absolutely no impediment to such
monstrous behavior.
“Cheated recounts two instances when staffers told superiors
that football or men’s basketball stars handed in plagiarized work. The
university took swift, decisive action, the authors write: It punished those
who made the reports.”
Hmm, so the book
says that when faculty reported students as cheating, the faculty were punished
for catching cheaters. Hmm, who else has been saying that on campuses
throughout the country faculty are punished for catching cheaters? Oh yeah, me.
I know the things
I say in this blog are outlandish to the point of incredulity. I totally
respect if readers of my blog think I’m making stuff up. Thus, I take pleasure
when others report and document, in writing, exactly the same things I say
here.
UNC happened to get caught, then made things worse by trying
to sweep the scandal under the rug with superficial “investigations” that said,
“Move along, folks, nothing to see here.”
Now, the kind of scandals going on at UNC don’t happen
everywhere…but many schools have frauds, even “wide open frauds” known by
hundreds, if not more, personnel at the institution. The problem is, faculty
are intimidated, and the few faculty left with integrity that try to do
something, merely get punished and hit with retaliation that can be both petty
and bizarre.
So, while this book covers the huge
scandal at UNC, I’m not beneath giving an “I told you so” when the next wide
open scandal erupts…I promise you, there’ll be another one just as big, just as
long-running, and just as widely known despite endless administrative attempts
to squelch any investigation into the truth of the matter.
I’m pleased to see that some folks
understand the academic fraud going on at UNC (and elsewhere) is far bigger
than just the fake courses for athletes that—let’s face it—we all know are a
part of “almost” every institution with sportsball:
Talk about exploitation of the athletes (some of them at least)
is a distraction from the big picture: that many colleges and universities have
decided to enroll academically weak, disengaged students and keep them in
school (and thus bringing in revenue) with easy-to-pass courses and inflated
grades.
This really is the ultimate reveal of the
UNC scandal: if a university, even a big name university with a great
reputation, decides to sell out and offer completely fake courses and bogus
degrees, there is nothing, nothing,
to stop it from doing so. Even if whistleblowers come forward, nothing will be
done, and the scandal can run for years before finally seeing the light of day.
Next time we’ll quickly consider those
private e-mails that mysteriously appeared, and, again, I’ll point out the
easiest way that could have happened is if administration wanted to retaliate
against the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment